Rep. Maxine Waters knows that the walls are closing in, and she is in full blown panic mode! Her last ditch effort is to trash Elon Musk and President Donald Trump.

During the House Financial Services Committee hearing on Tuesday, Waters voiced her “concerns” before grilling Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell,“When Musk comes knocking at the Fed’s door, are you going to let him in?”

Sounds to me more like she is testing the waters to see how screwed she really is.

Powell hesitantly replied, “I don’t have anything for you on that.”

Waters pressed, “Would you like to tell us today that you won’t let DOGE into the Federal Reserve or have access to the systems and the data?”

Powell firmly replied, “So we don’t, I don’t have any, we’ve had no contact and I don’t really have, I have nothing for you to report today on that.”

“Well, you know what happened at Treasury and you know what happened over at the CFPB and the people of this country are being violated because all of our privacy is being taken up by Elon Musk and Trump and we don’t know what all they have on us, our bank accounts, everything in our lives,” Waters reluctantly admitted.

WATCH:

Well, well, well….the party of “love” and “tolerance” is once again calling for physical harm against a person they do not agree with. All in the name of “democracy” of course. *Initiate eye roll*

Democrat Representative Robert Garcia is now calling on Democrats to fight DOGE leader Elon Musk with “actual weapons” for “democracy.”

“I think is really important, and what the American public wants is for us to bring actual weapons to this bar fight,” the congressman said. “This is an actual fight for democracy, for the future of this country, and it’s important to push back…”

WATCH:

JUST IN: Democrat Rep. Robert Garcia says Democrats need to fight Elon Musk with "actual weapons," says it needs to be done for "democracy."

"I think is really important, and what the American public wants is for us to bring actual weapons to this bar fight."

"This is an actual… pic.twitter.com/8PYo16kNK9

— Collin Rugg (@CollinRugg) February 12, 2025

So will it be considered an insurrection if these idiots actually listen and attempt to injure or kill Musk because this baboon of a leader told them to do so? Will he be charged alongside them, if so?

This is the political climate that was nurtured and encouraged during the Biden administration.

Former President Joe Biden waged war on household appliances, which targeted gas stoves, washing machines, dishwashers, and more. An odd hill to die on, but here we are.

President Donald Trump is not having it any longer. On Tuesday, he announced that he is instructing Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Secretary Lee Zeldin to oversee getting rid of the regulations.

Trump wrote, “I am hereby instructing Secretary Lee Zeldin to immediately go back to my Environmental Orders, which were terminated by Crooked Joe Biden, on Water Standards and Flow pertaining to SINKS, SHOWERS, TOILETS, WASHING MACHINES, DISHWASHERS, etc., and to likewise go back to the common sense standards on LIGHTBULBS, that were put in place by the Trump Administration, but terminated by Crooked Joe. I look forward to signing these Orders. THANK YOU!!!”

Biden was a busy bee, passing nonsense laws while ignoring the real issues. During his presidency he imposed climate standards for several household appliances – which experts warned would result in higher-priced alternatives that were lower quality. Once again, costing Americans more money.

Lame duck Joe Biden wants to ban 40% of water heaters.

Such a ban would force consumers to pay an additional $450 for alternatives.

President @realDonaldTrump must end Biden's war on appliances and let Americans buy what they want! pic.twitter.com/1s7mbHyJR2

— Stephen Moore (@StephenMoore) January 9, 2025

In July of 2023, Biden targeted water heaters by assigning them greater efficiency standards. A month later, he imposed an incandescent lightbulb ban, which limited the lighting available for customers to buy.

CBS: "Incandescent light bulbs are now banned in the United States," thanks to an initiative revived by the Biden administration.

LED bulbs — now Americans' only option — are significantly shorter-lasting and more expensive than traditional bulbs. pic.twitter.com/yoWwHmzHNK

— RNC Research (@RNCResearch) August 2, 2023

Meanwhile, the border stayed wide open. That shows you exactly where his priorities were. He did not actually care about Americans in the slightest.

Another point for the “conspiracy theorists” who were gaslighted and lied to for YEARS about Rep. Ilhan Omar and her relationship with her brother.

The “Squad” member has been longtime rumored to have been married to her brother, which she denied. However, the truth finally came to light in a new report, confirming the rumor.

Trending Politics reports:

According to those close to the Democrat, Omar allegedly vowed to “do what she had to do” to get her brother papers authorizing him to live in the country. Conservative critics cried foul, accusing her of marrying Ahmed Elmi in an unlawful bid to game the U.S. citizenship system.

That’s exactly what she did, claims one Somali community leader.

Abdihakim Osman, a former friend of the Squad congresswoman, is the first person to come forward and confirm that it was Rep. Omar’s intention all along to get her brother papers to live in the U.S. Because of the lack of paperwork in war-torn Somalia, no paperwork of their sibling relationship is available, allowing her deception to fly under the radar for two decades.

“She said she needed to get papers for her brother to go to school. We all thought she was just getting papers to allow him to stay in this country,” Osman told the Daily Mail.

It was reported that Omar married Ahmed Hirsi in 2002, in a Muslim ceremony that was unrecognized legally, and then the couple split up in 2008. However, Omar had a baby while married to her brother, Elmi, in 2009.

What in the Alabama is going on here…

“When [Hirsi] and Ilhan got married, a lot of people were invited. It was a big Islamic wedding uniting two large clans in the community,” Osman explained. “When she married Elmi, no one even knew about it… No one knew there had been a wedding until the media turned up the certificate years later.”

Osman’s revelations are sure to spark renewed focus on Omar’s relationship with her brother. Originally, she dismissed accusations of a false marriage as “baseless, absurd rumors” and accused journalists of Islamophobia if they dared to ask about her marriage to Elmi. More recently, she has stayed quiet and refused to answer further questions.

“The Congresswoman is focused on the work her constituents sent her to Washington to accomplish,” a spokesperson for the congresswoman said to the outlet.

Omar and her first husband, Hirsi, were married in a Muslim ceremony that went unrecognized by the state of Michigan because they did not file paperwork. The couple had their first child while married and a second while she was legally married to Elmi.

By the late 2000s, Elmi, an “effeminate” man, began appearing by her side in the community, Osman confirmed.

“People began noticing that Ilhan and Southside (Hirsi) were often with a very effeminate young guy,” Osman revealed. “He was very feminine in the way he dressed — he would wear light lipstick and pink clothes and very, very, short shorts in the summer. People started whispering about him.”

“[Hirsi] and Ilhan both told me it was Ilhan’s brother and he had been living in London but he was mixing with what were seen as bad influences that the family did not like. So they sent him to Minneapolis as ‘rehab,’” the community leader added.

Lat month, the New York Post reported that the FBI was launching a probe into Omar’s marriage to Elmi, reportedly boasting a “trove of documents” to hand over to authorities.

So, as it would appear, not only with Omar marry her own brother, she also committed marriage fraud.

On Tuesday, the Trump administration announced that, in addition to the files relating to the assassinations of former President John F. Kennedy and Martin Luther King Jr., the infamous client list of sex traffickers and Democratic Party financier Jeffrey Epstein…..who did NOT kill himself, by the way.

Rep. Anna Paulina Luna, who is leading the task force assigned to declassifying the files, stated that there are thousands of documents preparing to be released. She said, “With the stroke of a pen, [President Trump] committed to declassifying the files concerning the assassinations of President John F. Kennedy, Robert F. Kennedy, and Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. A decision not just monumental, but pivotal.”

🔥🚨BREAKING NEWS: Jeffrey Epstein client list and files are going be released on the first day of Kash Patel’s tenure as FBI director. This has been confirmed by Glenn Beck. It is finally time pic.twitter.com/DUwNUzRdfK

— Dom Lucre | Breaker of Narratives (@dom_lucre) February 11, 2025

Trending Politics reports:

Luna, who was tapped to head up the House Oversight Task Force on Declassification of Federal Secrets, announced that the task force will be conducting investigations into UFO/UAP phenomena, unidentified submerged objects also known as USOs, the origins of COVID-19 and previously unreleased files relating to the September 11 attacks.

The congresswoman then announced that Jeffrey Epstein’s infamous client list — which has long been rumored to contain the names of numerous high-profile Democratic Party politicians and allied celebrities — will be released. Several Republican members of Congress will be detailed to the task force, which is set to hold its first hearing in March.

“The date will be announced soon. And we’ve already initiated close to a dozen communications with various agencies, to include Pam Bondi at the Department of Justice and the Secretary of State,” Luna explained. 

She added, “This will no longer be a task force that makes bold promises only to fade into irrelevance or send strongly worded letters. This will be a relentless pursuit of truth and transparency, and we will not stop until the American people have the answers they deserve. We will cut through the bureaucracy, challenge the stonewalling, and ensure that the American people finally get the truth that they have been denied for too long.”

PBS just bent the knee to the King of the North – er, I mean – President Donald Trump.

In response to an executive order given by Trump, PBS reluctantly shut down their diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) office and removed their DEI staffers. This was confirmed by a public broadcaster on Monday evening.

“In order to best ensure we are in compliance with the President’s executive order around Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion we have closed our DEI office,” said the federally funded PBS. “The staff members who served in that office are leaving PBS. We will continue to adhere to our mission and values. PBS will continue to reflect all of America and remain a welcoming place for everyone.”

🚨BREAKING: PBS shuts down its DEI Department

"In order to best ensure we are in compliance with the President’s executive order around Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion we have closed our DEI office. The staff members who served in that office are leaving PBS."

Per: The Hill pic.twitter.com/AFfSJGCZp6

— dustin mills (@dustinemills24) February 13, 2025

Trending Politics reports:

In January, President Trump issued executive orders to dismantle DEI programs within federal agencies, reinforcing merit-based employment practices. The move has influenced several major corporations to reassess and often reduce their DEI initiatives.

For instance, Google abandoned its diversity hiring goals, citing recent court decisions and federal directives. Similarly, Meta, Amazon, McDonald’s, and Walmart have scaled back their DEI programs, responding to political pressures and legal challenges.

Founded in 1969, PBS operates as a private, non-commercial organization funded through government grants, corporate sponsors, and viewer donations. Unlike commercial networks, it does not rely on traditional advertising.

Earlier in February, Federal Communications Commission (FCC) Chair Brendan Carr launched an investigation into NPR and PBS to see if they had breached federal rules that govern how public broadcasters transmit commercials.

“I am concerned that NPR and PBS broadcasts could be violating federal law by airing commercials,” Carr wrote expressed in a report. “In particular, it is possible that NPR and PBS member stations are broadcasting underwriting announcements that cross the line into prohibited commercial advertisements.”

FCC regulations allow businesses to support noncommercial radio and television stations — such as NPR or PBS — through on-air announcements known as underwriting sponsorships. While such sponsorships have similarities to commercial advertising, they come with additional FCC regulations that do not apply to regular radio or television ads.

“To the extent that these taxpayer dollars are being used to support a for-profit endeavor or an entity that is airing commercial advertisements, then that would further undermine any case for continuing to fund NPR and PBS with taxpayer dollars,” he added to his letter before sending to NPR CEO Katherine Maher and PBS CEO Paula Kerger.