Ohio Senate Bill 1, a sweeping reform of the state’s higher education system, has passed both the Republican-controlled Senate and House and is anticipated to be signed into law by Governor DeWine. The bill bans diversity, equity, and inclusion programs, limits faculty teaching, and puts an end to faculty strikes at public universities and community colleges.

Democrats criticize the bill, claiming it suppresses free speech and erodes academic freedom, while supporters argue it will enhance higher education and safeguard students’ rights.

The Center Square reports:

Thousands of opponents, protesters and Democrats likely won’t have much luck pushing Ohio Republican Gov. Mike DeWine to veto a bill that overhauls higher education in the state.

DeWine has already said he will likely sign the bill that prohibits diversity, equity and inclusion, along with expressing political views, restricts how faculty teaches and ends faculty strikes at the state’s 37 public universities and community colleges.

Senate Bill 1 passed the Republican-majority Senate and House of Representatives along party-line votes and cleared the Senate again Wednesday on another party-line concurrence vote.

“SB1 will enrich the learning experience of students at our public universities and colleges, places where our best and brightest will be able to learn without prejudice, speak their mind without being canceled, be honest about their positions without fear of faculty retaliation and consider all sides of an issue and make up their own minds,” said Kristina Roegner, R-Hudson, chairwoman of the Senate Higher Education Committee.

In a letter to DeWine urging a veto, Democrats said the legislation stifles free speech, pushes Republican beliefs and is detrimental to higher education throughout the state.

“This legislation is a misguided attempt by overreaching legislators to impose their ideological beliefs on our public universities,” the letter reads. “The bill undermines academic freedom, attacks collective bargaining rights, and jeopardizes the future of higher education in our state.”

During hearings in the Senate and House, committees received more than 1,700 testimony submissions opposing the bill, while less than 50 supported it. Through the process, thousands of Ohio college students protested at the statehouse.

“This is the worst piece of legislation I have ever voted on since I became a senator three years ago,” said Sen. Bill DeMora, D-Columbus. “There is nothing positive in this bill. It’s going to ruin higher education.”

Greg Lawson, research fellow at The Buckeye Institute, was one of the supporters, saying SB1 is a win for students.

“Ohio took a major step toward improving higher education in Ohio with the adoption of the policies in Ohio Senate Bill 1, and Senator Jerry Cirino deserves a round of applause for his tireless efforts and leadership on these critical reforms,” Lawson said. “If enacted, the reforms in Senate Bill 1 will better position Ohio’s public universities to teach students and equip them for success after graduation.”

Continue reading on The Center Square

Arizona Attorney General Kris Mayes has teamed up with 23 other states in a lawsuit against the Trump administration, aiming to unfreeze FEMA funds designated for disaster response and cybersecurity initiatives.

As reported by The Center Square:

Arizona Attorney General Kris Mayes is part of a coalition that wants a court to force the Trump administration to unfreeze “essential” funding from the Federal Emergency Management Agency.

The Office of the Attorney General says the Trump administration is defying “multiple court orders” by withholding millions of dollars in FEMA grants to states. Twenty-two other attorneys general agree and have asked the U.S. District Court for the District of Rhode Island to intervene.

“This reckless behavior puts lives at risk and undermines the ability of states to respond to disasters,” said Mayes in a press release. “With wildfire season upon us, I will not stand by and allow the Trump administration to jeopardize public safety. The court must do everything in its power to enforce these orders.”

The funds are for programs that respond to natural disasters and cybersecurity threats, according to Mayes.

The actions from the Trump administration are part of a broader effort to examine and cut down on spending. In a Jan. 27 memo, Matthew J. Vaeth, then the acting director of the White House Office of Management and Budget, wrote that the American people gave President Donald Trump a “mandate” to increase the impact of every taxpayer dollar.

“In Fiscal Year 2024, of the nearly $10 trillion that the Federal Government spent, more than $3 trillion was Federal financial assistance, such as grants and loans,” wrote Vaeth. “Career and political appointees in the Executive Branch have a duty to align Federal spending and action with the will of the American people as expressed through presidential priorities.”

Vaeth added that financial assistance should be dedicated to advancing not only the Trump administration’s priorities but ensuring a stronger and safer America and promoting efficiency in government, among other things.

Meanwhile, Trump signed an executive order on March 18 to “empower states, localities and citizens to more effectively prepare” for weather events and cyber-attacks.

A White House Fact Sheet says it also launched a National Resilience Strategy that will outline ways to advance this effort.

Other states that are part of the coalition suing to unfreeze FEMA funds include California, Colorado, Nevada and New Mexico.