Tuesday, November 11, 2025
No menu items!
Newsletter
type here...
Home Blog Page 36

Sweet Victory: Ice Cream Makers Ditch Artificial Dyes in MAHA Health Push

Keely Compson
-
0
Sweet Victory: Ice Cream Makers Ditch Artificial Dyes in MAHA Health Push

Key Takeaways:

  • FDA Greenlights Naturals: New approvals include gardenia-based blue dye, signaling an industry shift toward transparency and consumer choice.
  • 90% Market Commitment: Ice cream makers pledge to remove seven artificial dyes by 2028, opting for natural alternatives like fruit-based colors.
  • Trump-Era Push: Move follows administration calls for cleaner ingredients without heavy-handed regulation—voluntary action leads the way.

America’s sweet tooth just got a little healthier—at least in theory. Ice cream makers representing 90% of U.S. supply have pledged to ditch artificial dyes within three years, federal health officials announced Monday. The push comes after President Trump urged food companies to rethink synthetic additives and embrace more natural alternatives, signaling a win for transparency and consumer choice—not heavy-handed regulation.

“This is a Renaissance moment for health in America,” said FDA Commissioner Marty Makary. About 40 manufacturers, including industry giants under the International Dairy Foods Association, agreed to remove seven petroleum-based dyes—Red 3, Red 40, Green 3, Blue 1, Blue 2, Yellow 5 and Yellow 6—by 2028. The switch will replace artificial coloring with natural sources like fruit and plant extracts.

Critics caution that removing dyes won’t turn ice cream into a health food. “It still is a food that should be consumed in moderation,” said Deanna Hoelscher, a University of Texas nutrition expert. Still, this move signals progress in consumer-driven reform without the heavy hand of Washington mandates.

Makary hinted that upcoming dietary guidelines could even reverse decades-old myths demonizing natural saturated fat—music to the ears of free-market advocates tired of outdated nutritional dogma. Meanwhile, companies like Turkey Hill are already leading the charge, and the FDA is fast-tracking natural color approvals, including a new blue derived from gardenia fruit.

Bottom line: The Trump administration is letting markets innovate, consumers choose, and entrepreneurs lead—proving again that voluntary action beats regulatory overreach every time.

Red Tape Out, Innovation In: Trump’s Plan to Win the AI War

Keely Compson
-
0
Red Tape Out, Innovation In: Trump’s Plan to Win the AI War

Key Takeaways:

  • Regulation Rollback: Trump scraps Biden-era restrictions, clearing the way for open-source AI development and global tech exports.
  • Innovation Over Interference: Federal AI funds will bypass states with strict AI laws; FCC to review state barriers.
  • America First in Tech: Plan prioritizes energy for data centers, expanded chip deals, and a roadmap to beat China in the AI race.

President Donald Trump is doubling down on America’s AI dominance—and this time, it’s all about unleashing innovation instead of strangling it with red tape. On Wednesday, the administration will roll out a sweeping new AI blueprint aimed at cutting government barriers and igniting a full-throttle tech boom that keeps the U.S. ahead of China in the 21st-century arms race for artificial intelligence.

“Winning the AI Race” is the theme of the White House event, hosted by AI czar David Sacks alongside Secretary of State Marco Rubio and National Economic Adviser Kevin Hassett. According to a summary seen by Reuters, the plan calls for exporting U.S. AI technology abroad, opening the door for open-source AI development, and slamming the brakes on restrictive state laws that threaten to choke growth.

Translation: Washington wants AI innovation to thrive—everywhere.

The blueprint will also block federal AI funds from flowing to states with “tough AI rules” and asks the FCC to step in if state policies conflict with national priorities. And Trump isn’t shy about rolling back the Biden-era “high fence” approach that slapped limits on AI chip exports and throttled global access. Those restrictions? Gone.

In Trump’s America, the strategy is simple: empower entrepreneurs, grow jobs, and secure economic and military supremacy without handcuffing the private sector. As Trump put it, America isn’t just playing catch-up in AI—we’re leading the charge.

‘Who Is Going to Die?’: Himes Loses It Over Trump’s Treason Remark

Keely Compson
-
0
‘Who Is Going to Die?’: Himes Loses It Over Trump’s Treason Remark

Key Takeaways:

  • Trump Goes Bold: Calls Obama the “leader of the gang” and accuses him of “treason” from the Oval Office.
  • Democrats Melt Down: Rep. Jim Himes warns, “Someone will die because of this,” tying it to January 6th.
  • The Bigger Play: Critics say Dems are using fear tactics to distract from the Epstein scandal and Trump’s corruption claims.

Democrats are sounding the alarm—again—this time because President Donald Trump dared to call out former President Barack Obama for what he calls “treason.” Speaking from the Oval Office, Trump declared, “If you look at those papers, they have him stone-cold… The leader of the gang was President Obama, Barack Hussein Obama… He’s guilty. This was treason.”

Cue the pearl-clutching. On MSNBC’s “Deadline,” Rep. Jim Himes (D-CT) declared, “Someone will die because President Donald Trump accused former President Barack Obama of treason.” According to Himes, using strong language like “treason” is practically an invitation for violence. He even tied it to January 6th, saying, “It was all driven by a lie propagated by Donald Trump, and now we’re seeing that playbook again.”

WATCH:

Here’s the problem: Democrats seem more worried about Trump’s words than about accountability for what he’s alleging—a massive abuse of power by the previous administration. Instead of asking whether Obama weaponized government intelligence, they’re spinning doomsday scenarios to distract from the real story.

Himes doubled down, blaming Tulsi Gabbard as well, and warning that some “tiny percentage” of Americans might act on Trump’s statements. In other words: free speech is too dangerous when conservatives use it.

The bottom line? This isn’t about public safety—it’s about silencing Trump, deflecting from the Epstein fallout, and keeping Americans from asking uncomfortable questions about corruption at the highest levels.

WATCH: Sen. Cruz Torches Biden Over Border Chaos

AFN
-
0
WATCH: Sen. Cruz Torches Biden Over Border Chaos

Why it matters:
Sen. Ted Cruz’s critique of the Biden administration’s border policies underscores significant concerns about national security and the rule of law, which could have far-reaching implications for economic stability and community safety. As debates over immigration reform continue, the outcomes will impact American businesses and the labor market.

Key Takeaways:
– Cruz condemned the Biden administration for allegedly disregarding immigration laws, claiming it prioritizes partisan politics over community safety.
– He highlighted the dangers posed by “gotaways,” undocumented immigrants who evade capture, suggesting they are more likely to engage in criminal activities.
– Democrats countered Cruz’s claims, arguing that the Trump administration’s deportation policies disproportionately targeted noncriminal individuals and relied on racial profiling.

The Big Picture:
The ongoing border security debate reflects a broader ideological divide over immigration policy in the United States. Cruz’s remarks emphasize a commitment to law and order, arguing that a secure border is essential for protecting American communities and fostering a stable economic environment. The implications of lax border policies extend beyond immediate safety concerns; they can disrupt labor markets and undermine the principles of free enterprise by creating uncertainty for businesses reliant on a lawful workforce.

Conversely, Democrats argue that the previous administration’s approach led to unjust deportations and a climate of fear, suggesting that a more humane immigration policy is necessary. This clash of perspectives highlights the need for a balanced approach that respects individual liberties while ensuring national security and economic prosperity.

What They’re Saying:
“No president has ever done what [Biden’s] administration did, which is say we don’t care about the law,” Cruz stated, emphasizing the perceived failures of current border policies.

Go Deeper:
Original source: The Center Square

CA vs. Pro-Life Clinics: Is the State Silencing Women’s Right to Choose Life?

AFN
-
0
CA vs. Pro-Life Clinics: Is the State Silencing Women’s Right to Choose Life?

Why it matters:
The ongoing legal battle over the right of pro-life clinics to discuss Abortion Pill Reversal highlights critical issues surrounding free speech, individual liberty, and the role of government in healthcare. The outcome could set a precedent affecting how medical information is shared and the rights of patients seeking alternatives to abortion.

Key Takeaways:
– Thomas More Society is appealing a U.S. district court’s denial of a preliminary injunction for Culture of Life Family Services, a pro-life clinic in California.
– The appeal challenges California Attorney General Rob Bonta’s restrictions on pro-life clinics discussing Abortion Pill Reversal, a treatment that may reverse the effects of the abortion pill.
– The Abortion Pill Reversal treatment has a reported success rate of 64% to 68%, providing women with an option to continue their pregnancies after starting a medical abortion.

The Big Picture:
The case underscores the tension between government regulation and the rights of individuals and organizations to express their beliefs and provide information. California Attorney General Rob Bonta’s actions are seen by critics as an infringement on the First Amendment, particularly targeting pro-life speech while allowing abortion providers to operate without similar scrutiny. This raises important questions about the balance of power in healthcare and the extent to which government can dictate the flow of medical information. Pro-life advocates argue that women deserve access to all available options, especially in moments of crisis, and that restricting this information is not only a violation of free speech but also detrimental to women’s health.

As the appeal moves to the 9th Circuit, the implications extend beyond California, potentially influencing how similar cases are handled nationwide. The outcome could either reinforce the rights of pro-life organizations to communicate freely or further entrench government control over healthcare narratives, impacting the broader landscape of medical freedom and individual choice.

What They’re Saying:
“Bonta’s targeting of pro-life pregnancy centers and their speech hurts women in crisis,” said Peter Breen, executive vice president and head of litigation at Thomas More Society. “These centers want to inform women in the midst of an unwanted chemical abortion about APR.”

Go Deeper:
Original source: The Center Square

BREAKING: DNI Tulsi Gabbard Promises Explosive Document Dump Tomorrow

Keely Compson
-
0
BREAKING: DNI Tulsi Gabbard Promises Explosive Document Dump Tomorrow

Key Takeaways:

  • Transparency Push: DNI Tulsi Gabbard says more documents will drop tomorrow, targeting Obama-era operations and media collusion.
  • What’s at Stake: The release could reveal political scheming, intelligence abuses, and compromised press integrity.
  • Why It Matters: Greater transparency reinforces accountability, protects democracy, and challenges the cozy Washington status quo.

The transparency hammer is about to drop! U.S. Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard announced Tuesday that a new batch of documents will be released tomorrow, exposing schemes linked to former President Barack Obama, his administration, and even members of the media.

This move signals a major shift toward accountability in Washington—something that’s long overdue. For years, Americans have suspected backroom deals and media collusion, and now those suspicions might finally get the sunlight they deserve.

Gabbard didn’t mince words about the significance of this release. While details remain under wraps, sources suggest the documents could shed light on intelligence abuses, politically motivated operations, and the cozy relationships between government officials and press elites.

WATCH:

Why does this matter? Because transparency is the backbone of a free society. When the government picks winners and losers—or when media power brokers play gatekeeper—it erodes public trust and undermines the very principles that keep markets free and democracy strong.

Critics on the left will cry “political theater,” but let’s be clear: Americans deserve the truth, no matter which party it implicates. As Gabbard prepares to pull back the curtain, the question is simple—what will these revelations mean for Obama’s legacy and the media outlets that claim to be watchdogs?

Tomorrow’s drop could reshape the conversation on power, accountability, and just how deep the swamp really goes. Buckle up.

White House Meeting: Trump, Marcos Eye Trade and Security Deals

AFN
-
0
White House Meeting: Trump, Marcos Eye Trade and Security Deals

Key Takeaways:

  • Strength in Partnership: Trump hosts President Marcos at the White House to deepen U.S.-Philippines ties amid Indo-Pacific tensions.
  • Fair Trade First: Trump signals possible 20% tariffs on Filipino goods unless a reciprocal trade deal is reached.
  • Countering China: Alliance focuses on security and economic freedom in the face of Beijing’s aggression in the South China Sea.

President Donald Trump is set to welcome Philippine President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. to the White House on Tuesday as Washington and Manila look to deepen security and economic ties amid rising tensions in the Indo-Pacific.

Marcos’ three-day visit underscores the strategic importance of this alliance as China ramps up aggression in the South China Sea, including repeated clashes with the Philippines over the contested Scarborough Shoal. The Philippines remains a key U.S. treaty partner, and this meeting signals a renewed commitment to counter Beijing’s influence with strength, not appeasement.

Marcos has already met with Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, highlighting the high-level coordination between the two nations. Beyond defense, trade is a major focus. Trump has made it clear: the U.S. seeks fair, reciprocal trade. “America will always defend its workers,” Trump said previously, after warning he may impose 20% tariffs on Filipino goods starting Aug. 1 unless a new agreement is reached.

This summit isn’t just about diplomacy—it’s about securing supply chains, protecting sovereignty, and ensuring economic freedom in a region critical to global commerce. America is leading from the front, and partners who value liberty know it.

No iPhones Allowed: BlackRock Tightens Security for China Travel

AFN
-
0
No iPhones Allowed: BlackRock Tightens Security for China Travel

Key Takeaways:

  • Security First: BlackRock bans company laptops and iPhones on China trips, requiring loaner devices instead.
  • Why It Matters: Move highlights rising cybersecurity risks and Beijing’s growing control over foreign firms.
  • Big Picture: American companies are balancing access to China’s market with protecting proprietary data.

BlackRock, the world’s largest asset manager, is taking no chances when it comes to data security in China. According to an internal memo cited by Bloomberg, employees traveling to China for business will be required to use temporary loaner phones and will be prohibited from bringing company-issued devices such as iPhones, iPads, and laptops.

The memo also bans remote access to BlackRock’s network through virtual private networks during these trips. Employees won’t have access to the firm’s internal systems while traveling personally in China either.

While BlackRock declined to comment, the move underscores growing concerns about cybersecurity and intellectual property theft in the world’s second-largest economy. It also comes on the heels of a U.S. State Department alert that Chinese authorities recently blocked a U.S. Patent and Trademark Office employee from leaving the country while on personal travel.

For American firms, the message is clear: global expansion requires vigilance. With Beijing tightening control and data risks escalating, companies are balancing opportunity with security. In an era where information is power, protecting proprietary data isn’t just smart policy—it’s a fiduciary responsibility.

House Shutdown: GOP Blocks Dems’ Epstein File Stunt

Keely Compson
-
0
House Shutdown: GOP Blocks Dems’ Epstein File Stunt

Key Takeaways:

  • Showdown in the House: GOP leaders shut down the floor to block a Democratic-led stunt to force a vote on Epstein-related documents.
  • Johnson Stands Firm: “There is no daylight between House Republicans and the president on maximum transparency,” says Speaker Johnson.
  • Next Round: Expect fireworks after August recess as Massie and Khanna vow to push a binding vote.

House Republicans pulled the emergency brake on Monday, shutting down the floor and halting legislative business to block a last-minute Democratic maneuver to force a vote on releasing Jeffrey Epstein-related files.

The drama unfolded as Democrats on the Rules Committee tried to sneak in a vote compelling the release of Epstein documents—a move Republicans blasted as political theater. Rather than play along, the GOP recessed the committee and sent lawmakers packing for the August break.

Democrats cried foul. “Republicans are so afraid of taking that vote that they are torching their own agenda instead of doing something they promised the voters they would do,” fumed Ranking Member Jim McGovern.

But GOP leadership says transparency is already in motion. Speaker Mike Johnson stressed, “There is no daylight between the House Republicans and the president on maximum transparency… All of that is in process right now.” He added, “If further congressional action is necessary, we’ll look at that. But I don’t think we’re at that point.”

Johnson declared, “Here’s what I would say about the Epstein files: There is no daylight between the House Republicans, the House, and the president on maximum transparency,” Johnson said Monday. “He has said that he wants all the credible files related to Epstein to be released. He’s asked the attorney general to request the grand jury files of the court. All of that is in process right now.”

“My belief is we need the administration to have the space to do what it is doing, and if further congressional action is necessary or appropriate, then we’ll look at that,” he continued. “But I don’t think we’re at that point right now because we agree with the president.”

Johnson later added, “There was nothing else that was time-sensitive this week that we needed to handle by way of a rule,” he said. “So the work of the House will continue all week, we’ll be here doing our work, and we won’t allow [Democrats] a platform to try and engage in political games.”

Meanwhile, Representatives Thomas Massie and Ro Khanna vowed to push forward with a discharge petition to force a binding vote later this year. Massie told reporters, “Their Epstein bill resolution is non-binding so it’s kind of fake,” he said. “The resolution I have with Khanna would be binding on the President.”

Bottom line: Democrats want headlines, not solutions. Republicans want the truth—minus the circus. Expect this fight to heat up when Congress returns in September.

1...353637...146Page 36 of 146

Links

Stay connected

Newsletter Signup

- Advertisement -

© America First News | All rights reserved.