Tuesday, January 27, 2026
No menu items!
Home Blog Page 35

FDA Launches National CEO Forums to Rethink Red Tape, Accelerate Innovation

0

Key Takeaways:

  • Direct Access: FDA Commissioner Marty Makary is leading nationwide CEO Forums to hear directly from biotech and pharma leaders on modernizing the regulatory framework.
  • Innovation Focus: The initiative aims to cut red tape, accelerate life-saving therapies, and improve patient access without compromising safety or scientific integrity.
  • High-Level Dialogue: Forums will be held in major innovation hubs through September, with attendance limited to top executives from companies actively filing with the FDA.

The Food and Drug Administration is hitting the road—and for once, it’s not to pile on more regulation. FDA Commissioner Marty A. Makary, M.D., M.P.H., along with top agency leaders Vinay Prasad, M.D., M.P.H., and George Tidmarsh, M.D., Ph.D., have launched a nationwide “CEO Forum” listening tour to hear directly from biotech and pharmaceutical executives about how Washington can get out of the way and help innovation thrive.

“These CEO Forums are a chance for the FDA to listen and gather feedback from those at the front lines of discovery,” said Makary. “We are committed to strengthening a regulatory environment that enables breakthroughs to reach patients faster, while upholding the highest standards of safety and scientific integrity.”

The forums will be held in major innovation hubs including Boston, San Francisco, New York, and Raleigh through September. The invite list isn’t open to just anyone: eligible companies must have at least one active IND, NDA, or BLA on file with the FDA, and attendance is preferred at the CEO level.

It’s a refreshing sign of accountability for an agency that has long been criticized for bureaucratic bottlenecks slowing life-saving therapies. By cutting through red tape and listening to leaders who actually bring products to market, the FDA is signaling it wants to modernize its approach.

If done right, these forums could lead to faster cures, better patient access, and a regulatory framework that rewards—not punishes—American ingenuity.

Trump Tightens Deadline on Putin: End War or Pay the Price (Literally)

Key Takeaways:

  • Trump gives Putin just 10–12 days to stop the war in Ukraine, slashing his original 50-day deadline.
  • Severe tariffs—and penalties on Russia’s trade partners—are on deck if no peace progress is made by early August.
  • Trump’s strategy: Strength over softness, using economic leverage instead of endless wars to force peace.

President Donald Trump is turning up the heat on Vladimir Putin—and this time, there’s a deadline.

On Monday, Trump announced he’s shortening the 50-day ultimatum he issued earlier this month, now giving Putin just 10 to 12 days to stop the bloodshed in Ukraine. “No reason in waiting,” Trump declared. “We just don’t see any progress being made.”

Trump’s warning isn’t just talk. If Putin doesn’t back down by August 7–9, Trump says he’ll unleash severe tariffs—not just on Russia, but on their trading partners too. That’s economic pressure with teeth, not the empty hand-wringing we’ve seen from globalist diplomats.

Trump’s America-first diplomacy pairs moral clarity with fiscal leverage. “Putin’s got to make a deal. Too many people are dying,” he said during a stop in Scotland. When asked about another sit-down with the Russian leader, Trump was blunt: “I’m not so interested in talking anymore.”

This isn’t about punishing the Russian people—Trump emphasized his love for them. But it is about holding corrupt leadership accountable without dragging America into another endless war.

Meanwhile, Russia continued its overnight assault, launching over 300 drones and missiles, injuring civilians—including a 4-year-old girl—in Ukraine’s capital. Still, Ukraine’s leadership welcomed Trump’s tougher stance. “Putin understands only strength,” said Zelenskyy’s chief of staff.

With Biden’s peace efforts dead in the water, Trump’s tariff threat may be the clearest shot at forcing Putin to the table—and ending the war without spending American blood and treasure.

Insane No More: Trump Brings Back Asylums to End Urban Chaos

Key Takeaways:

  • Restoring Order: Trump’s executive order rolls back legal barriers to institutionalizing the seriously mentally ill who pose a risk to public safety.
  • Ending Failed Policy: The move targets 1960s-era precedents that left cities flooded with untreated addiction, violence, and chaos.
  • Compassion with Courage: It’s not about cruelty—it’s about protecting the public while getting people the long-term treatment they desperately need.

In a move that’s already sending the Left into hysterics, President Donald J. Trump has signed an executive order that effectively reinstates the right to institutionalize the mentally ill who are living on the streets and posing a threat to themselves or the public.

For decades, soft-on-crime Democrats have let cities descend into chaos—now, Trump is cleaning up the mess. The order directs the Attorney General to “seek, in appropriate cases, the reversal of Federal or State judicial precedents and the termination of consent decrees” that have blocked civil commitment. That’s a legal earthquake—and a long-overdue course correction.

This policy shift takes aim at a failed 1960s-era framework that prioritized “freedom” over public safety and sanity. The result? Thousands living in squalor, addicted, unstable, and untreated—clogging emergency rooms, attacking pedestrians, and turning America’s great cities into dystopian nightmares.

Trump’s approach is simple: You shouldn’t have to dodge needles and schizophrenic outbursts on your walk to work. People who are seriously mentally ill and can’t care for themselves belong in treatment—not on the streets, not in jail, and definitely not in tent cities next to schools and playgrounds.

This isn’t about cruelty—it’s about compassion with a backbone. The dignity of the individual matters, but so does the safety of everyone else.

Trump’s order brings common sense back into focus, and it’s about time. Public safety isn’t partisan—it’s patriotic. And now, it’s policy.

Graham Drops Bombshell: Calls for Special Counsel on Obama’s 2016 Intel Role

0

Key Takeaways:

  • Newly declassified docs show Obama may have been told in 2016 there was no evidence of Russian election interference—before the narrative suddenly changed.
  • Graham says it’s time for a special counsel to investigate Obama’s possible role in altering the intelligence story that fueled years of political turmoil.
  • “Disturbing,” says Graham—what did Obama know, and when? The public deserves answers, not another buried scandal.

On Sunday’s Meet the Press, Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) lit a fire under the political establishment, calling for a special counsel to investigate former President Barack Obama’s role in shaping the Russia narrative during the 2016 election. His remarks come in light of newly declassified documents shared by Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard that raise serious questions about the Obama administration’s actions.

Host Kristen Welker attempted to cast doubt, citing a previous bipartisan Senate Intelligence report affirming Russian election interference. But Graham didn’t flinch.

“The Intel Committee looked at the matter… Russia was trying to interfere… but they didn’t achieve their goal,” Graham said. “What she [Gabbard] found is that in 2016, the intel community told President Obama there’s no evidence Russia was involved… yet the narrative later changed.”

Translation: The story may have been rigged after the fact.

Graham stopped short of accusing Obama of treason but made it clear the American people deserve answers. “It bothers me. It’s disturbing that this is new information,” he said, urging the appointment of a special counsel.

Let’s be real—weaponizing intelligence for political gain is not just shady, it’s anti-American. If the federal government was used to kneecap a candidate through a fabricated narrative, that’s not politics—that’s a scandal.

For a nation built on checks and balances, it’s time we put this one under the microscope. Sunshine is the best disinfectant—and this one’s long overdue.

Rep. Mike Collins Eyes Senate Seat—And He’s Bringing the Bulldozer

0

Why it matters:
Georgia Republican U.S. Rep. Mike Collins has officially entered the race to challenge Democratic Sen. Jon Ossoff in 2026, signaling a competitive political landscape that could impact fiscal policies and economic freedom in the state. His campaign emphasizes a tough stance on illegal immigration, which resonates with many voters concerned about public safety and government accountability.

Key Takeaways:
– Collins announced his candidacy with a strong endorsement from former President Donald Trump, highlighting his commitment to conservative values.
– He introduced the Laken Riley Act, aimed at deporting criminal illegal aliens, following a tragic incident involving a Venezuelan national.
– Collins joins a growing field of Republican candidates, including Rep. Buddy Carter, as the race heats up ahead of the 2026 general election.

The Big Picture:
As the political landscape in Georgia shifts, the entry of Rep. Mike Collins into the Senate race underscores the importance of strong leadership focused on fiscal responsibility and public safety. The Laken Riley Act, which Collins champions, reflects a broader Republican commitment to addressing illegal immigration and ensuring that American communities are safe. This focus on law and order aligns with the values of many freedom-minded citizens who prioritize individual liberty and the rule of law.

Moreover, with Governor Brian Kemp reportedly backing potential candidate Derek Dooley, the Republican primary is shaping up to be a significant battleground. The outcome could influence not only Georgia’s political future but also set the tone for national discussions on economic policies and government accountability. As candidates vie for the support of business leaders and informed citizens, the emphasis on entrepreneurship and limited government will be crucial in shaping the narrative leading up to the 2026 elections.

What They’re Saying:
“I wrote the Laken Riley Act so that we can deport criminal illegal aliens wherever they are, making sure this never happens again,” said Collins in his announcement video.

Go Deeper:
Original source: The Center Square

Maher Eats Crow – ADMITS Trump’s Tariffs Boosted Economy

0

Key Takeaways:

  • Maher admits he was wrong, saying Trump’s tariffs didn’t crash the economy like he expected—“I gotta own it.”
  • Stock market, manufacturing, and retail sales are booming, with inflation and unemployment down across the board.
  • Even Trump’s critics can’t ignore the results—America’s economy is thriving under bold, pro-worker trade policies.

Bill Maher just did something rare in elite liberal circles—he admitted Trump was right. On his Club Random podcast, the HBO comedian confessed that his long-standing predictions about Trump’s tariffs tanking the U.S. economy were flat-out wrong.

“I gotta own it,” Maher told his guest. “These tariffs were going to f***ing sink this economy… and they didn’t.”

This is the same Bill Maher who once gleefully fantasized about a recession if it meant getting rid of Trump. Now? He’s stuck reconciling with the facts: record-high stock markets, booming manufacturing, and Americans spending like they’re not in the Great Depression he expected.

“I don’t see a country in a depression at all,” Maher admitted. “I see people out there just living their lives.” Translation? Reality crushed the doom-and-gloom narrative.

To be clear, Trump’s tariff strategy wasn’t about economic sabotage—it was about restoring leverage in a broken global trade system. And guess what? It worked. With new trade deals rolling in from Europe and other global partners, and the U.S. labor force benefiting from revitalized domestic production, Trump’s America-first economic policy is delivering.

The results speak for themselves:
✔️ Inflation down
✔️ Unemployment down
✔️ Consumer confidence up
✔️ Retail sales surging

Turns out, betting on American workers and holding foreign competitors accountable isn’t economic suicide—it’s economic leadership.

Even Maher can’t deny it now: Trump’s economy is booming, and the Left’s tired predictions are busted.

EPIC FAIL: Crazy-Eyed Crockett’s Oversight Power Play Falls Flat

0

Key Takeaways:

  • Crockett claimed her massive social media following qualified her to lead House Democrats on Oversight—her colleagues didn’t buy it.
  • She finished dead last in the vote after concerns surfaced she might push for impeaching Trump, rattling moderates.
  • Even Dem strategist James Carville questioned her approach, asking, “Does that help us at the end of the day?”

Rising Democrat Rep. Jasmine Crockett (D-TX) just learned the hard way: Twitter followers don’t equal political capital. In a cringe self-promoting pitch to lead Democrats on the House Oversight Committee, Crockett told The Atlantic she deserved the role because she had the biggest social media following. Spoiler alert: her colleagues weren’t impressed.

While veteran Rep. Gerry Connolly (D-VA) prepared to step down amid health issues, Crockett launched her campaign—texts, emails, hallway schmoozing—all based on her supposed communications superpowers. “There’s one clear person in the race that has the largest social-media following,” she boasted. That person was, of course, her.

She even told Rep. Maxine Dexter that Americans simply didn’t know Biden was “an old man that gets sh*t done,” suggesting she could fix that narrative with viral flair. Unfortunately for her, style didn’t beat substance. When reports surfaced that Crockett might use the post to push for another Trump impeachment, moderate Democrats got cold feet. She pulled just six votes, dead last, while Rep. Robert Garcia of California sailed to victory.

Adding to the drama, Crockett reportedly tried to halt The Atlantic’s interviews with colleagues once she realized her performance wasn’t resonating. James Carville nailed it: “She has an instinct for making headlines. But does that help us at the end of the day?”

Crockett’s loss proves a timeless truth: leadership is earned—not liked, shared, or followed. Washington still requires more than a good filter and a trending hashtag.

Adams Calls for Sanctuary Reform—Just Not for ‘Innocent’ Lawbreakers

Key Takeaways:

  • Mayor Eric Adams now supports modifying sanctuary laws—but only to target violent repeat offenders.
  • He still defends giving taxpayer-funded benefits to undocumented immigrants pursuing the “American Dream.”
  • Adams claims sanctuary status means everyone deserves resources, even if they’re in the country illegally.

New York City Mayor Eric Adams is finally admitting what most commonsense Americans have known for years: blindly protecting violent criminals under the guise of “sanctuary” isn’t sustainable.

During Friday’s Good Day New York on Fox 5, Adams addressed the federal lawsuit challenging the city’s sanctuary policies and called for “modification” of the law—at least when it comes to violent offenders. After the recent shooting of an off-duty Border Patrol agent by repeat offenders, even Adams couldn’t deny that something needs to change.

“I called for a modification in our existing laws,” he said, adding that “we should be able to coordinate with the federal authorities to address those situations.”

Sounds promising—until he pivoted to defend handing out taxpayer-funded benefits to illegal immigrants who haven’t committed violent crimes. “We should not be harming them at all,” Adams said. “These are innocent people who are just trying to pursue the American Dream.”

He went even further, claiming, “When people use the term of sanctuary city, what we’re saying is that you have the right with your tax dollars to get the resources you deserve.”

Let’s be clear: American citizens fund those tax dollars—not undocumented immigrants. And resources aren’t infinite. A city drowning in debt and crime shouldn’t be prioritizing non-citizens over law-abiding taxpayers.

Mayor Adams is trying to thread the political needle—but New Yorkers are tired of policies that protect criminals while punishing citizens.

Hawley’s Plan: Tax China, Cut Checks for American Families

0

Why it matters:
Senator Josh Hawley’s new bill to issue tariff rebate checks to American families underscores a growing push for fiscal relief amid rising costs. This initiative aligns with President Trump’s vision of leveraging tariffs to bolster domestic manufacturing while providing direct financial support to working Americans.

Key Takeaways:
– Hawley’s legislation proposes a minimum $600 rebate check for every adult and child in American families, akin to COVID-19 stimulus payments.
– President Trump has expressed support for the bill, emphasizing the need to return tariff revenue to hardworking Americans.
– While tariffs aim to protect U.S. jobs, concerns persist about potential price increases on consumer goods.

The Big Picture:
Senator Hawley’s proposal reflects a commitment to fiscal responsibility and the principle of returning wealth to the American people. By utilizing tariff revenues, the bill seeks to empower families and stimulate economic activity, reinforcing the notion that government should facilitate, not hinder, individual prosperity. This approach aligns with the broader goal of restoring American manufacturing and ensuring that the benefits of trade policies are felt by everyday citizens.

As the U.S. navigates a complex global trade landscape, the focus on tariffs as a tool for economic advantage highlights the importance of prioritizing American interests. While some economists caution against the inflationary effects of tariffs, the potential for direct financial relief through rebate checks presents a compelling case for supporting American families in these challenging times.

What They’re Saying:
“Working people need relief now. They’ve earned it. Let’s return their money to them asap.” — Senator Josh Hawley

Go Deeper:
Original source: The Center Square