Tuesday, November 11, 2025
No menu items!
Newsletter
type here...
Home Blog Page 34

Terrorism Charges on Table After Michigan Man Stabs 11

AFN
-
0
Terrorism Charges on Table After Michigan Man Stabs 11

Why it matters:
A violent attack at a Walmart in Traverse City, Michigan, raises concerns about public safety and the implications for community resilience. As the nation grapples with issues of crime and security, this incident underscores the importance of individual responsibility and the role of law enforcement in maintaining order.

Key Takeaways:
– A Michigan man, 42-year-old Bradford James Gille, faces terrorism charges after allegedly stabbing 11 people in a seemingly random attack at a Walmart.
– Two victims remain in serious condition, but all are expected to survive; the victims range in age from 29 to 84, including a Walmart employee.
– Gille is charged with 11 counts of assault with intent to murder and one count of terrorism, potentially facing life in prison if convicted.

The Big Picture:
This incident highlights the critical need for communities to remain vigilant and proactive in the face of random acts of violence. The swift response from local citizens and law enforcement demonstrates the power of individual action and community solidarity. In a free society, the ability of citizens to step up in times of crisis is a testament to American exceptionalism and the spirit of entrepreneurship that thrives on personal responsibility.

Moreover, the charges of terrorism reflect a growing recognition that such acts are not just isolated incidents but can have far-reaching effects on community morale and economic stability. As we navigate these challenges, it is essential to uphold the values of liberty and security, ensuring that our communities remain safe havens for free enterprise and innovation.

What They’re Saying:
“Any time there is a mass incident like this, where it is something that appears to be a very random act of violence… it is, we believe, in some ways done to affect the entire community, to put fear in the entire community,” said Grand Traverse County Prosecutor Noelle Moeggenberg.

Go Deeper:
Original source: The Center Square

Crow Melts: Calls Tulsi a ‘Weapon of Mass Distraction’ Over Obama Allegations

Keely Compson
-
0
Crow Melts: Calls Tulsi a ‘Weapon of Mass Distraction’ Over Obama Allegations

Key Takeaways:

  • Rep. Jason Crow blasted Tulsi Gabbard’s allegations against Obama, calling her a “weapon of mass distraction.”
  • Crow refused to support a special counsel, brushing off calls for an investigation despite newly surfaced documents.
  • The D.C. establishment is circling the wagons—but Americans still want answers and accountability.

The D.C. establishment is sweating—and Rep. Jason Crow (D-CO) made it crystal clear on Fox News Sunday. When pressed about Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard’s recent allegations against former President Barack Obama, Crow didn’t offer facts—he launched into character assassination.

“Tulsi Gabbard’s conspiracy theories would be sad if they weren’t so dangerous,” Crow said, accusing her of trying to “curry favor” with Donald Trump. His zinger? Calling her a “weapon of mass distraction.”

Let’s translate: A former Democrat turned independent thinker is exposing skeletons in the Obama-era closet, and the Left is panicking. Instead of engaging with the content of Gabbard’s allegations—outlined in newly surfaced documents—Crow simply dismissed them out of hand.

Host Shannon Bream kept it balanced, asking if the public deserves a special counsel or investigation to ensure accountability. “I’ve pored through these documents,” she said. “Do you think a special counsel is warranted… to reassure people… that top officials are not going to be up to no good?”

Crow’s answer? Deflect and defend. He touted the “four investigations” into Russian election interference, including the one led by Sen. Marco Rubio. But here’s the thing: rehashing old talking points doesn’t excuse fresh allegations—or dismiss the right of the American people to demand transparency.

If Gabbard’s claims are so ridiculous, let’s test them under the light of a real investigation. Because truth doesn’t fear scrutiny—only bureaucrats do.

From Capitol Hill to Club Fed: George Santos Begins His Final Act

Keely Compson
-
0
From Capitol Hill to Club Fed: George Santos Begins His Final Act

Key Takeaways:

  • George Santos begins a 7-year sentence for fraud and identity theft tied to his 2022 campaign.
  • He threw a farewell party on X, calling prison an “upgrade” and blaming political enemies.
  • A judge denied leniency, citing zero remorse; Trump clemency remains unlikely.

The rhinestones are packed, the curtain has fallen, and George Santos—the most fabulously fraudulent freshman Congress has seen in decades—is officially headed to prison.

The disgraced New York Republican, once hailed for flipping a blue-leaning district on Long Island, is set to begin serving a seven-year sentence for federal wire fraud and identity theft after pleading guilty last summer. He has until 2 p.m. Friday to report, likely to a cushy minimum-security facility—an upgrade from the medium-security unit originally assigned, according to Santos himself in an interview with Al Arabiya. Because of course, even his prison time needs a glow-up.

Santos, 37, celebrated his farewell with a self-hosted “going away” bash on X (formerly Twitter), where he wrote: “From the halls of Congress to the chaos of cable news… Was it messy? Always. Glamorous? Occasionally. Honest? I tried… most days.”

Let’s not forget: this is the same man who faked working at Goldman Sachs, claimed he was a volleyball star at a college he never attended, and called himself “Jew-ish.” The real story? He was stealing identities to bankroll his campaign while hawking a fake resume.

In April, a federal judge rejected Santos’ request for a reduced two-year sentence, stating she wasn’t convinced his remorse was genuine. Though Santos claimed to be “profoundly sorry” in the lead-up to sentencing, he undercut his own apology by repeatedly whining about being the target of a political witch hunt and so-called prosecutorial overreach.

Since being expelled by his own GOP colleagues, Santos has kept busy with a podcast and Cameo gigs, even hoping his loyalty to President Trump might score him clemency. No dice—at least not yet.

He told Tucker Carlson, “I’m not built for this,” calling prison a “practically a death sentence.” But let’s be real: it’s accountability, not assassination.

Fraud meets consequences. Even if they’re minimum-security chic.

Trump Brings Receipts: Schools Powell in Hard Hat Showdown (WATCH)

Keely Compson
-
0
Trump Brings Receipts: Schools Powell in Hard Hat Showdown (WATCH)

President Donald J. Trump isn’t just talking about accountability—he’s bringing the receipts. In a tense, made-for-TV moment, Trump confronted Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell during a site visit, both men sporting hard hats for the occasion.

“So we’re taking a look and it looks like it’s about $3.1 billion,” Trump said, referring to recent financial data. Powell, clearly caught off guard, replied, “I’m not aware of that.”

Trump didn’t miss a beat: “Yeah, it just came out.”

Powell doubled down: “Yeah, I haven’t heard that from anybody.”

Then came the mic-drop moment. Trump reached into his suit pocket, pulled out an official report, and handed it over—complete with the numbers Powell claimed didn’t exist.

WATCH:

The exchange underscored Trump’s trademark style: prepared, combative, and unafraid to challenge the so-called experts. While Powell squirmed, Trump leaned into his reputation as a dealmaker who knows the numbers and won’t hesitate to expose Washington spin.

This public clash isn’t just political theater—it highlights a deeper debate over transparency, fiscal responsibility, and whether unelected bureaucrats are truly accountable to the American people. One thing is certain: Trump came ready, and Powell wasn’t.

White House Rolls Out Blueprint to Secure America’s Future in AI Revolution

Keely Compson
-
0
White House Rolls Out Blueprint to Secure America’s Future in AI Revolution

Key Takeaways:

  • AI.gov Debuts: Trump’s new site outlines plans to dominate global AI through deregulation, infrastructure, and ethical standards.
  • Staying Ahead of China: Trump calls AI “the oil of the future” and pledges to block adversaries from exploiting U.S. innovation.
  • Future Workforce: Presidential AI Challenge will prepare students for an AI-driven economy.

The Trump Administration officially unveiled AI.gov on Wednesday, a new hub outlining the President’s bold “action plan” to keep the United States at the forefront of artificial intelligence. The strategy is unapologetically pro-innovation: cut red tape, modernize the electric grid, and stop foreign adversaries like China from piggybacking on U.S. breakthroughs.

“Winning this race will usher in a new era of human flourishing, economic competitiveness, and national security for the American people,” the site declares. The message is clear: America intends to lead, not follow.

This launch follows months of White House focus on AI. President Trump and Vice President JD Vance have repeatedly warned that ceding ground to Beijing is not an option. “AI is the new oil; it’s the oil of the future,” Trump said in 2023. “We have to make sure we dominate it.”

The website also teases a Presidential AI Challenge designed to spark interest in AI among students, ensuring the next generation can thrive in an AI-driven economy. The initiative promises early training to “demystify this technology and prepare America’s students to be confident participants in the AI-assisted workforce.”

AI.gov went live just hours before Trump is expected to sign executive orders aimed at political bias in AI chatbots and boosting U.S. AI exports. While the administration’s massive “Stargate” AI project—backed by OpenAI, Oracle, and SoftBank—faces reported delays, the mission remains the same: Keep America first in the AI revolution.

Trump Scores Big Win: U.S. Beef Heads to Australia After 20-Year Ban

Keely Compson
-
0
Trump Scores Big Win: U.S. Beef Heads to Australia After 20-Year Ban

Key Takeaways:

  • 20-Year Ban Lifted: For the first time in two decades, Australia will allow imports of fresh and frozen U.S. beef.
  • Trump’s Trade Breakthrough: The agreement corrects a $29 billion trade imbalance where Australian beef flowed into U.S. markets while ours was blocked.
  • Boost for American Ranchers: Industry leaders praise President Trump for opening new markets and fighting unfair trade practices.

American ranchers just scored a massive victory thanks to President Donald J. Trump’s latest trade breakthrough. For the first time in two decades, Australia will allow imports of fresh and frozen U.S. beef—ending years of one-sided trade and bureaucratic stonewalling.

“American farmers and ranchers produce the safest, healthiest beef in the world,” said U.S. Secretary of Agriculture Brooke L. Rollins. “Gone are the days of putting American farmers on the sidelines. This is yet another example of the kind of market access the President negotiates to bring America into a new golden age of prosperity.”

The numbers tell the story. While U.S. beef was locked out of Australia for 20 years, Australia exported nearly $29 billion worth of beef into the United States. That’s not free and fair trade—that’s an economic chokehold. Thanks to this agreement, American ranchers will finally get a fair shot at the Australian market.

“This is a long-overdue correction to an unfair trade imbalance,” said NCBA President Buck Wehrbein. “President Trump continues to fight for American farmers and ranchers, open export markets, and fix broken trade deals.”

The U.S.-Australia Free Trade Agreement, implemented in 2005, was supposed to allow U.S. beef into Australia. Instead, Australia exploited loopholes and non-scientific restrictions to keep American beef out—until now.

With the ban lifted, Australian consumers will soon taste what Americans already know: U.S. beef sets the global standard. Another Trump trade win, another boost for America’s agricultural backbone.

Jim Jordan Sounds Alarm: Obama Probe ‘Worse Than We Thought’

Keely Compson
-
0
Jim Jordan Sounds Alarm: Obama Probe ‘Worse Than We Thought’

Key Takeaways:

  • Weaponized Government: Jordan says Obama officials schemed to block Trump’s victory and sabotage his presidency.
  • The Setup: Trump’s January 2017 intel briefing included the now-debunked Steele dossier—later leaked to media for credibility.
  • Bigger Than Expected: “The only thing we had wrong was it was worse than we thought,” Jordan told Hannity.

On Monday’s Hannity, Rep. Jim Jordan (R-OH) blasted what he calls the ultimate abuse of power—Obama-era officials allegedly weaponizing the intelligence community to undermine Donald Trump before and after the 2016 election.

Jordan told Sean Hannity the revelations from Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard’s criminal referral to the DOJ confirm a disturbing truth: “It all started back in 2016, and it wasn’t just to keep him from winning the election… it was to undermine his presidency after he had already won.”

He walked through a stunning timeline:

  • December 9, 2016—Obama convenes top intel brass, including Comey, Brennan, and Clapper, at the White House. “They put together a new assessment,” Jordan noted, after shelving the original.
  • Fast forward to January 3, 2017, when Chuck Schumer warned Trump, “If you mess with the intelligence community… they have six ways from Sunday to get back at you.” 
  • Three days later, Trump heads into what he thought was a standard briefing. Instead? “It’s a setup,” Jordan said.
  • Comey and company introduce the discredited Steele dossier—then conveniently leak the meeting to legitimize fake claims in the press.

“It was all garbage,” Jordan declared, calling this the origin of the government’s weaponization against a duly elected president. His bottom line? “The only thing we had wrong was it was worse than we thought.”

If true, this isn’t just political drama—it’s a constitutional crisis. America thrives on limited government, not partisan spy games.

DHS Bombshell: 230,000 Migrant Children Missing After Border Release

AFN
-
0
DHS Bombshell: 230,000 Migrant Children Missing After Border Release

Why it matters:
The alarming number of unaccompanied minors released into the U.S. without proper oversight raises serious concerns about the integrity of our immigration system and the potential risks these children face. This situation underscores the need for fiscal responsibility and effective governance to protect vulnerable populations while maintaining the rule of law.

Key Takeaways:
– Over 230,000 unaccompanied minors were released from immigration custody during the Biden administration, with many now unaccounted for, according to the Department of Homeland Security (DHS).
– A significant number of these children were sent to invalid addresses, and sponsors were not adequately vetted, leading to potential risks of trafficking and exploitation.
– A new ICE initiative aims to locate these minors, with 50,000 homes visited so far, but the challenges highlight systemic failures in the immigration process.

The Big Picture:
The recent testimony from DHS Inspector General Joseph Cuffari before the House Oversight Committee reveals critical gaps in the management of unaccompanied minors in the U.S. The report indicates that more than 43,000 of these children have missed court hearings and are now untraceable, raising alarms about their safety and well-being. This situation not only poses a humanitarian crisis but also reflects a broader failure in our immigration system that needs urgent reform.

As we navigate these challenges, it is essential to balance compassion for vulnerable populations with the need for a robust and accountable immigration framework. A system that prioritizes individual liberty and fiscal responsibility can ensure that we protect those in need while upholding the rule of law. The current administration must take decisive action to rectify these systemic issues, ensuring that our immigration policies reflect American exceptionalism and the values of free enterprise.

What They’re Saying:
“This is not simply an administrative problem. It’s a systemic breakdown that poses grave risks to unaccompanied alien children (UACs) and the integrity of our legal immigration system.” — Joseph Cuffari, DHS Inspector General.

Go Deeper:
Source: The Center Square

Sanctuary Showdown: Trump Admin Sues New York City

AFN
-
0
Sanctuary Showdown: Trump Admin Sues New York City

Why it matters:
The Trump administration’s lawsuit against New York City over its sanctuary policies highlights the ongoing tension between federal immigration enforcement and local governance. This case could set a precedent affecting how cities manage immigration and public safety, with significant implications for fiscal responsibility and the rule of law.

Key Takeaways:
– The Trump administration has filed a lawsuit against New York City, claiming its sanctuary policies shield dangerous criminals from deportation.
– The lawsuit cites a recent violent incident involving a “criminal alien” as evidence of the risks posed by these policies.
– The case underscores the broader national debate on immigration enforcement and local government authority, with potential impacts on public safety and taxpayer resources.

The Big Picture:
New York City has long positioned itself as a sanctuary for immigrants, a stance that has drawn criticism from those who argue it undermines federal law and public safety. The Trump administration’s legal action reflects a growing frustration with local policies that prioritize non-cooperation with federal immigration authorities. As the city grapples with an influx of over 230,000 migrants since early 2022, the financial burden on taxpayers has surged, with costs exceeding $8 billion for housing and services. This situation raises critical questions about the balance between compassion for immigrants and the responsibility to protect citizens from crime.

The lawsuit also serves as a reminder of the importance of adhering to the rule of law. By challenging New York City’s sanctuary policies, the Trump administration is advocating for a more unified approach to immigration enforcement that prioritizes public safety and fiscal accountability. As cities across the nation navigate similar challenges, the outcome of this case could influence future policies and the relationship between federal and local governments.

What They’re Saying:
“New York City has released thousands of criminals on the streets to commit violent crimes against law-abiding citizens due to sanctuary city policies,” stated Attorney General Pam Bondi. “If New York City won’t stand up for the safety of its citizens, we will.”

Go Deeper:
Original source: The Center Square

1...333435...146Page 34 of 146

Links

Stay connected

Newsletter Signup

- Advertisement -

© America First News | All rights reserved.