Tuesday, November 11, 2025
No menu items!
Home Blog Page 33

Maher Eats Crow – ADMITS Trump’s Tariffs Boosted Economy

0

Key Takeaways:

  • Maher admits he was wrong, saying Trump’s tariffs didn’t crash the economy like he expected—“I gotta own it.”
  • Stock market, manufacturing, and retail sales are booming, with inflation and unemployment down across the board.
  • Even Trump’s critics can’t ignore the results—America’s economy is thriving under bold, pro-worker trade policies.

Bill Maher just did something rare in elite liberal circles—he admitted Trump was right. On his Club Random podcast, the HBO comedian confessed that his long-standing predictions about Trump’s tariffs tanking the U.S. economy were flat-out wrong.

“I gotta own it,” Maher told his guest. “These tariffs were going to f***ing sink this economy… and they didn’t.”

This is the same Bill Maher who once gleefully fantasized about a recession if it meant getting rid of Trump. Now? He’s stuck reconciling with the facts: record-high stock markets, booming manufacturing, and Americans spending like they’re not in the Great Depression he expected.

“I don’t see a country in a depression at all,” Maher admitted. “I see people out there just living their lives.” Translation? Reality crushed the doom-and-gloom narrative.

To be clear, Trump’s tariff strategy wasn’t about economic sabotage—it was about restoring leverage in a broken global trade system. And guess what? It worked. With new trade deals rolling in from Europe and other global partners, and the U.S. labor force benefiting from revitalized domestic production, Trump’s America-first economic policy is delivering.

The results speak for themselves:
✔️ Inflation down
✔️ Unemployment down
✔️ Consumer confidence up
✔️ Retail sales surging

Turns out, betting on American workers and holding foreign competitors accountable isn’t economic suicide—it’s economic leadership.

Even Maher can’t deny it now: Trump’s economy is booming, and the Left’s tired predictions are busted.

EPIC FAIL: Crazy-Eyed Crockett’s Oversight Power Play Falls Flat

0

Key Takeaways:

  • Crockett claimed her massive social media following qualified her to lead House Democrats on Oversight—her colleagues didn’t buy it.
  • She finished dead last in the vote after concerns surfaced she might push for impeaching Trump, rattling moderates.
  • Even Dem strategist James Carville questioned her approach, asking, “Does that help us at the end of the day?”

Rising Democrat Rep. Jasmine Crockett (D-TX) just learned the hard way: Twitter followers don’t equal political capital. In a cringe self-promoting pitch to lead Democrats on the House Oversight Committee, Crockett told The Atlantic she deserved the role because she had the biggest social media following. Spoiler alert: her colleagues weren’t impressed.

While veteran Rep. Gerry Connolly (D-VA) prepared to step down amid health issues, Crockett launched her campaign—texts, emails, hallway schmoozing—all based on her supposed communications superpowers. “There’s one clear person in the race that has the largest social-media following,” she boasted. That person was, of course, her.

She even told Rep. Maxine Dexter that Americans simply didn’t know Biden was “an old man that gets sh*t done,” suggesting she could fix that narrative with viral flair. Unfortunately for her, style didn’t beat substance. When reports surfaced that Crockett might use the post to push for another Trump impeachment, moderate Democrats got cold feet. She pulled just six votes, dead last, while Rep. Robert Garcia of California sailed to victory.

Adding to the drama, Crockett reportedly tried to halt The Atlantic’s interviews with colleagues once she realized her performance wasn’t resonating. James Carville nailed it: “She has an instinct for making headlines. But does that help us at the end of the day?”

Crockett’s loss proves a timeless truth: leadership is earned—not liked, shared, or followed. Washington still requires more than a good filter and a trending hashtag.

Adams Calls for Sanctuary Reform—Just Not for ‘Innocent’ Lawbreakers

Key Takeaways:

  • Mayor Eric Adams now supports modifying sanctuary laws—but only to target violent repeat offenders.
  • He still defends giving taxpayer-funded benefits to undocumented immigrants pursuing the “American Dream.”
  • Adams claims sanctuary status means everyone deserves resources, even if they’re in the country illegally.

New York City Mayor Eric Adams is finally admitting what most commonsense Americans have known for years: blindly protecting violent criminals under the guise of “sanctuary” isn’t sustainable.

During Friday’s Good Day New York on Fox 5, Adams addressed the federal lawsuit challenging the city’s sanctuary policies and called for “modification” of the law—at least when it comes to violent offenders. After the recent shooting of an off-duty Border Patrol agent by repeat offenders, even Adams couldn’t deny that something needs to change.

“I called for a modification in our existing laws,” he said, adding that “we should be able to coordinate with the federal authorities to address those situations.”

Sounds promising—until he pivoted to defend handing out taxpayer-funded benefits to illegal immigrants who haven’t committed violent crimes. “We should not be harming them at all,” Adams said. “These are innocent people who are just trying to pursue the American Dream.”

He went even further, claiming, “When people use the term of sanctuary city, what we’re saying is that you have the right with your tax dollars to get the resources you deserve.”

Let’s be clear: American citizens fund those tax dollars—not undocumented immigrants. And resources aren’t infinite. A city drowning in debt and crime shouldn’t be prioritizing non-citizens over law-abiding taxpayers.

Mayor Adams is trying to thread the political needle—but New Yorkers are tired of policies that protect criminals while punishing citizens.

Hawley’s Plan: Tax China, Cut Checks for American Families

0

Why it matters:
Senator Josh Hawley’s new bill to issue tariff rebate checks to American families underscores a growing push for fiscal relief amid rising costs. This initiative aligns with President Trump’s vision of leveraging tariffs to bolster domestic manufacturing while providing direct financial support to working Americans.

Key Takeaways:
– Hawley’s legislation proposes a minimum $600 rebate check for every adult and child in American families, akin to COVID-19 stimulus payments.
– President Trump has expressed support for the bill, emphasizing the need to return tariff revenue to hardworking Americans.
– While tariffs aim to protect U.S. jobs, concerns persist about potential price increases on consumer goods.

The Big Picture:
Senator Hawley’s proposal reflects a commitment to fiscal responsibility and the principle of returning wealth to the American people. By utilizing tariff revenues, the bill seeks to empower families and stimulate economic activity, reinforcing the notion that government should facilitate, not hinder, individual prosperity. This approach aligns with the broader goal of restoring American manufacturing and ensuring that the benefits of trade policies are felt by everyday citizens.

As the U.S. navigates a complex global trade landscape, the focus on tariffs as a tool for economic advantage highlights the importance of prioritizing American interests. While some economists caution against the inflationary effects of tariffs, the potential for direct financial relief through rebate checks presents a compelling case for supporting American families in these challenging times.

What They’re Saying:
“Working people need relief now. They’ve earned it. Let’s return their money to them asap.” — Senator Josh Hawley

Go Deeper:
Original source: The Center Square

Europe Pays Up: Trump Strikes Historic Trade Win with EU

Key Takeaways:

  • Massive Energy & Investment Wins: The EU will purchase $750B in U.S. energy and invest $600B more into the American economy, fueling jobs and growth.
  • Tariff Rebalance: European imports face a new 15% U.S. tariff, while U.S. goods enter the EU at a 0% rate—closing a decades-long trade gap.
  • Military & Market Leverage: Europe committed to “hundreds of billions” in U.S. defense spending, proving Trump’s tough stance pays off at the negotiation table.

President Donald Trump just delivered a win for American workers and businesses, sealing a sweeping trade agreement with the European Union that rebalances a historically one-sided relationship. Announced Sunday from his Turnberry property in Scotland, the deal imposes a 15% baseline tariff on European imports — including autos — while keeping the existing 50% steel and aluminum duties intact. In return? The EU will buy $750 billion in American energy, zero its tariffs on U.S. goods, and invest another $600 billion directly into the U.S. economy.

Trump didn’t mince words: “We have the opening up of all of the European countries, which I think I could say were essentially closed… and now it’s open.”

That’s not all. The EU also agreed to a massive purchase of American military equipment — “hundreds of billions of dollars,” according to Trump — further cementing the U.S. as Europe’s defense backbone.

When asked what the U.S. gave up in exchange, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen made it clear: the EU had the surplus, and it was time to level the playing field. “We hit exactly the point we wanted to find: rebalance, but enable trade on both sides,” she said.

Translation: Trump didn’t cave — Europe did.

For decades, EU countries milked the transatlantic trade imbalance. This deal puts America first without shutting down global commerce. It’s pro-trade, pro-growth, and unapologetically pro-American. Exactly how free-market leadership is supposed to look.

Ticking Clock: Massie Warns Epstein Vote Coming Whether Congress Likes It or Not

0

Key Takeaways:

  • Rep. Thomas Massie plans to force a House vote to release Epstein files using a discharge petition after the August recess.
  • He’s calling for full transparency, including financial records, plea deals, and sealed documents.
  • With bipartisan support growing, Massie says leadership won’t be able to dodge a floor vote much longer.

Rep. Thomas Massie (R-KY) is done playing defense. On Sunday’s This Week on ABC, the Kentucky congressman made it clear: when Congress returns from August recess, he’s forcing a vote to unseal the Epstein files—whether House leadership likes it or not.

“I think we should get a lot more than just the book,” Massie said. “Let’s get the financial records of the estate… follow the money. We should look at the plea bargain… see what was the deal that was cut.”

No more sealed letters, redacted names, or “trust us” excuses from government insiders. Massie and Democrat Rep. Ro Khanna are invoking a rare discharge petition—a move that sidesteps leadership and puts power back in the hands of the people’s representatives. If they gather 218 signatures, the vote must happen. And according to Massie, they’re almost there.

“I have 12 Republican co-sponsors and I only need six more,” he said, signaling growing bipartisan pressure. “I think the pressure will build over August recess. I don’t think it will dissipate like the Speaker hopes it will.”

This isn’t about left or right—it’s about transparency, accountability, and equal justice under the law. The American people are tired of elites skating by with sealed records and sweetheart deals. If Congress can’t unseal the truth about Epstein’s web of corruption, what else are they protecting?

Massie’s drawing a line—and freedom-minded Americans are watching.

Rolling the Dice: Chicago Mayor Open to Video Gambling Despite Political Heat

0

Why it matters:
Chicago’s potential embrace of video gaming could unlock significant revenue streams for the city, addressing fiscal challenges while promoting entrepreneurship and economic growth. This shift reflects a broader conversation about local governance and the importance of maximizing available resources for community development.

Key Takeaways:
– Mayor Brandon Johnson is now open to video gambling in Chicago, despite previous skepticism from his administration.
– State Rep. Michael Kelly’s House Bill 2990 aimed to allow Chicago to opt out of video gaming but failed to progress in the legislature.
– Lawmakers argue that video gaming terminals (VGTs) could generate substantial revenue, with estimates of $250 million for the state and $50 to $70 million for the city.

The Big Picture:
The ongoing debate over video gaming in Chicago highlights a critical intersection of local governance and economic opportunity. With many Chicago restaurants struggling, the introduction of VGTs could provide a lifeline, helping to keep businesses afloat and generate much-needed tax revenue. Lawmakers have pointed out that cities like Rockford and Peoria have successfully utilized VGTs to bolster their economies, leaving Chicago at a disadvantage by not participating in this revenue-generating opportunity.

Moreover, the reluctance to embrace video gaming reflects a broader ideological struggle over fiscal responsibility and the role of government in facilitating economic growth. As state representatives emphasize the importance of accepting new revenue streams, the conversation underscores the need for Chicago’s leadership to prioritize financial innovation and entrepreneurship to secure a prosperous future for its residents.

What They’re Saying:
“If the city of Chicago needs financial support from the state as much as it seems to suggest it does by its leadership’s comments in the media, try to work towards taking ‘yes’ for an answer.” — State Rep. Daniel Didech, D-Buffalo Grove.

Go Deeper:
Original source: The Center Square

‘Tower of Terror’: Southwest Pilot Dodges Midair Collision After ATC Failure

0

Key Takeaways:

  • Near-Collision Chaos: A Southwest pilot had to nosedive mid-flight from Burbank to Vegas to avoid a collision after reportedly losing contact with air traffic control.
  • Passenger Panic: The sudden drop launched passengers into the ceiling, with one describing it as a real-life “Tower of Terror” experience.
  • Regulatory Red Flags: The incident highlights serious concerns about FAA inefficiency and fuels renewed calls to modernize or privatize air traffic control systems.

A Southwest Airlines flight from Burbank to Las Vegas turned into a near-death rollercoaster ride this weekend after a terrifying midair incident sent passengers airborne—literally.

Roughly ten minutes after takeoff, the pilot was forced to nosedive the aircraft to avoid what passengers say was a potential head-on collision. The maneuver slammed people into the ceiling, with several comparing it to Disney’s infamous “Tower of Terror” ride—minus the fun and safety restraints.

“About 10 minutes into the flight, we plummeted pretty far, and I looked around, and everyone was like, ‘OK, that’s normal’,” one passenger told reporters. “Then, within two seconds, it felt like the ride Tower of Terror… The screaming, it was terrifying. We really thought we were plummeting to a plane crash.”

According to passengers, the pilot later informed them that the plane had “almost collided with another plane,” adding that “they had lost air traffic control signal.” At least one flight attendant was reportedly injured during the dive.

laneLet’s be clear: this isn’t a freak storm or random turbulence. This is a failure of government-run air traffic control—yet another reminder that bloated, bureaucratic systems are no match for accountability and innovation. Our skies shouldn’t be managed like the DMV. If this doesn’t reignite the push for privatizing and modernizing ATC systems, what will?

The free market can fly circles around government inefficiency—and when American lives are at stake, it’s time to let common sense take the cockpit.

Trump Targets Drug Dens, Squatter Camps with Homelessness Order

Key Takeaways:

  • Cracking Down on Chaos: Trump’s order empowers states to commit violent or mentally ill individuals and bans taxpayer funding for drug injection sites.
  • Funding With Conditions: Cities must enforce bans on open drug use, squatting, and loitering to qualify for key federal grants.
  • Compassion with Boundaries: Homeless sex offenders won’t be housed near children, and new care centers will provide long-term treatment, not sidewalks and tents.

President Donald J. Trump is drawing a hard line on public disorder, signing a sweeping Executive Order aimed at restoring safety and dignity to America’s cities—starting with removing violent vagrancy from the streets and redirecting federal resources toward real, results-driven solutions.

The order empowers the Attorney General to reverse outdated judicial precedents and end consent decrees that tie the hands of states and cities when it comes to committing individuals who are a danger to themselves or others. No more legal gymnastics to protect chaos.

The directive goes further: it prioritizes federal grants for states and municipalities that actually enforce laws—targeting open-air drug use, urban squatting, and loitering. It also redirects funds to treatment centers, assisted outpatient care, and recovery programs—not injection sites or “safe use” zones.

Trump’s approach rejects the failed compassion theater of the past. “We want to take care of them, but they have to be off our streets,” he said. Instead of allowing encampments to take over parks and sidewalks, the policy promotes humane, long-term institutional care for the mentally ill and addicted.

Sex offenders receiving homelessness assistance will no longer be housed near children, and shelters will have the option to protect women and children with exclusive housing.

The data speaks for itself: under Biden, street homelessness hit a record 274,224 in a single night. Billions wasted, cities overrun, and safety compromised. Trump’s order flips the script—putting public safety, accountability, and common sense first.

Compassion with backbone. That’s leadership.